4.5 Article

Revised classification/nomenclature of vitiligo and related issues: the Vitiligo Global Issues Consensus Conference

期刊

PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 E1-E13

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2012.00997.x

关键词

vitiligo; consensus conference

资金

  1. Associazione Ricerca Informazione per la Vitiligine (ARIV)
  2. National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-0407-10177] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0407-10177] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the 2011 International Pigment Cell Conference (IPCC), the Vitiligo European Taskforce (VETF) convened a consensus conference on issues of global importance for vitiligo clinical research. As suggested by an international panel of experts, the conference focused on four topics: classification and nomenclature; definition of stable disease; definition of Koebners phenomenon (KP); and autoimmune vitiligo. These topics were discussed in seven working groups representing different geographical regions. A consensus emerged that segmental vitiligo be classified separately from all other forms of vitiligo and that the term vitiligo be used as an umbrella term for all non-segmental forms of vitiligo, including mixed vitiligo in which segmental and non-segmental vitiligo are combined and which is considered a subgroup of vitiligo. Further, the conference recommends that disease stability be best assessed based on the stability of individual lesions rather than the overall stability of the disease as the latter is difficult to define precisely and reliably. The conference also endorsed the classification of KP for vitiligo as proposed by the VETF (history based, clinical observation based, or experimentally induced). Lastly, the conference agreed that autoimmune vitiligo should not be used as a separate classification as published evidence indicates that the pathophysiology of all forms of vitiligo likely involves autoimmune or inflammatory mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据