4.5 Article

Oncogenic BRAFV600E inhibits BIM expression to promote melanoma cell survival

期刊

PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 534-544

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2008.00491.x

关键词

BRAF; Bim; melanoma; apoptosis; Bcl-2

资金

  1. Astra Zeneca [ICI 182,780]
  2. University of Dundee [CI-1040]
  3. Plexxicon [PLX4720]
  4. St George's Hospital Medical School
  5. Wistar Institute
  6. Chiron Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Somatic activating mutations of BRAF are the earliest and most common genetic abnormality detected in the genesis of human melanoma. However, the mechanism(s) by which activated BRAF promotes melanoma cell cycle progression and/or survival remain unclear. Here we demonstrate that expression of BIM, a pro-apoptotic member of the BCL-2 family, is inhibited by BRAF -> MEK -> ERK signaling in mouse and human melanocytes and in human melanoma cells. Trophic factor deprivation of melanocytes leads to elevated BIM expression. However, re-addition of trophic factors or activation of a conditional form of BRAF(V600E) leads to rapid inhibition of BIM expression. In both cases, inhibition of BIM expression was dependent on the activity of MEK1/2 and the proteasome. Consistent with these observations, pharmacological inhibition of BRAF(V600E) or MEK1/2 in human melanoma cells (using PLX4720 and CI-1040 respectively) led to a striking elevation of BIM expression. Re-activation of BRAF -> MEK -> ERK signaling led to phosphorylation of BIM-EL on serine 69 and its subsequent degradation. Interestingly, endogenous expression of BIM in melanoma cells was insufficient to induce apoptosis unless combined with serum deprivation. Under these circumstances, inhibition of BIM expression by RNA interference provided partial protection from apoptosis. These data suggest that regulation of BIM expression by BRAF -> MEK -> ERK signaling is one mechanism by which oncogenic BRAF(V600E) can influence the aberrant physiology of melanoma cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据