4.7 Article

Extracts from Epilobium sp Herbs, Their Components and Gut Microbiota Metabolites of Epilobium Ellagitannins, Urolithins, Inhibit Hormone-Dependent Prostate Cancer Cells-(LNCaP) Proliferation and PSA Secretion

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 1842-1848

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.4941

关键词

Epilobium sp; oenothein B; urolithins; prostate specific antigen; arginase; LNCaP

资金

  1. Polish National Science Center [2011/01/D/NZ4/01261]
  2. European Regional Development Found

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracts from Epilobium sp. herbs have been traditionally used in the treatment of prostate-associated ailments. Our studies demonstrated that the extracts from Epilobium angustifolium, Epilobium parviflorum and Epilobium hirsutum herbs are potent prostate cancer cells (LNCaP) proliferation inhibitors with IC50 values around 35 mu g/ml. The tested extracts reduced prostate specific antigen (PSA) secretion (from 325.6 +/- 25.3 ng/ml to similar to 90 ng/ml) and inhibited arginase activity (from 65.2 +/- 1.1 mUnits of urea/mg of protein to similar to 40 mUnits of urea/mg protein). Selected constituents of extracts (oenothein B, quercetin-3-O-glucuronide, myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside) were proven to be active in relation to LNCaP cells. However, oenothein B was the strongest inhibitor of cells proliferation (IC50=7.8 +/- 0.8 M), PSA secretion (IC50=21.9 +/- 3.2 M) and arginase activity (IC50=19.2 +/- 2.0 M). Additionally, ellagitannins from E. hirustum extract were proven to be transformed by human gut microbiota into urolithins. Urolithin C showed the strongest activity in the inhibition of cell proliferation (IC50=35.2 +/- 3.7 M), PSA secretion (reduced PSA secretion to the level of 100.7 +/- 31.0 ng/ml) and arginase activity (reduced to the level of 27.9 +/- 3.3 mUnits of urea/mg of protein). Results of the work offer an explanation of the activity of Epilobium extracts and support the use of Epilobium preparations in the treatment of prostate diseases. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据