4.7 Article

Inhibition of Human Cytochrome P450 Enzymes 3A4 and 2D6 by β-Carboline Alkaloids, Harmine Derivatives

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 1671-1677

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.3458

关键词

Peganum harmala; beta-carboline alkaloids; harmine derivatives; CYP3A4; CYP2D6; inhibition

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation [08JC1418600, 08DZ1972101]
  2. Construction Program for Innovative Research Team in Shanghai Institutions of Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-Carboline alkaloids are the main chemical constituents of the plant Peganum harmala, while they also could be formed endogenously and found in coffee, alcoholic beverages and tobacco. Considering the fact that the possibility of herb-drug interactions has recently received great attention worldwide, the aim of the current study was to assess the potential for the metabolism-based drug-drug interactions arising from five beta-carboline alkaloids (harmine, harmaline, harmalol, harmol and harmane) from P. harmala in vitro. With microsome incubation assays and UPLC/HPLC methods, the inhibitions on human liver CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 enzymes by those beta-carboline alkaloids were studied kinetically. Harmine, harmol and harmane exhibited noncompetitive inhibition on the activity of CYP3A4 with K(i) values of 16.76, 5.13 and 1.66 mu M, respectively. These beta-carboline alkaloids were also found to be both substrates and inhibitors for CYP2D6. Harmaline, harmine and harmol showed typical competitive inhibition on the activity of CYP2D6 with Ki values of 20.69, 36.48 and 47.11 mu M, respectively. The inhibition of the two major CYP enzymes by those beta-carboline alkaloids suggested that changes in the pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs were likely to have occurred. Therefore, caution should be exercised for possible drug interactions of medicinal plants containing those beta-carboline alkaloids and CYP substrates. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据