4.7 Article

Danshen Extracts Decrease Blood C Reactive Protein and Prevent Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: A Controlled Pilot Study

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 1721-1725

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.2819

关键词

C reactive protein; danshen; Dryobalanops camphor; Panax notoginseng; Salvia miltiorrhiza; sanqi; stroke; transient ischemic attack

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30870848, 30870847]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficacy of a danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza) dripping pill (DDP) for secondary stroke prevention was evaluated in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. The preparation also contained Panax notoginseng (sanqi) and Dryobalanops camphor. Patients who had suffered from ischemic stroke or a transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 20 days were managed according to established guidelines, and were divided into groups to receive either DDP or non-DDP treatment according to their time of enrolment. Mortality, cerebrovascular events and any suspected adverse reactions during the 1-year follow-up were recorded and analysed. Hematological and hemorheological parameters were measured at the start of the study (baseline) and the end of the follow-up period. A total of 106 patients with ischemic stroke/TIA were enrolled, of which 52 were allocated to take DDP and 54 were in the control group. Recurrent stroke/TIA was observed in five patients (9.6%) with DDP and in 13 patients (24.1%) without DDP during the follow-up. Recurrence in the patient group taking DDP was lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in intracranial hemorrhage and mortality were detected between groups (p > 0.05). Blood C reactive protein decreased significantly in patients with DDP compared with patients without DDP. These results indicate that DDP treatment may reduce the risk for stroke/TIA recurrence, and this reduction of risk may be associated with its antiinflammatory effects. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据