4.2 Article

Resistance mechanisms and risk assessment regarding indoxacarb in the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua

期刊

PHYTOPARASITICA
卷 42, 期 5, 页码 585-594

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12600-014-0396-3

关键词

Enzyme assay; Indoxacarb; Realized heritability; Sodium channel; Synergist

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Industry Public Welfare Projects of China [200803007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a worldwide polyphagous pest with a strong ability to develop resistance. After 12 generations of selection by indoxacarb, a resistant strain (RR-indox) was obtained with a 240.04-fold resistance ratio compared with the susceptible strain (WH-SS), which was derived from the Wuhan Institute of Vegetable Science. The LC50 for the susceptible strain was 0.23 mg l(-1) and it increased to 55.21 mg l(-1) after 12 selected generations. The estimated realized heritability (h(2)) of the RR-indox strain was 0.25. The number of generations required for a 100-fold increase in LC50 was estimated to be nine under the 90% lethal dose. The inhibitors piperonyl butoxide (PBO), triphenyl phosphate (TPP), and diethylmeleate (DEM) had synergistic ratios of 0.87-, 0.31-and 0.36-fold in RR-indox, and 0.51-, 0.09-and 0.12-fold in WH-SS, respectively. A 3.75-fold increased level of activity of glutathione S-transferase was found in RR-indox compared with WH-SS, whereas a 1.99-fold higher activity level of carboxylesterase was observed. No significant differences in the cuticular penetration rate were found between RR-indox and WH-SS. A DNA fragment of 257 bp length of the IIS6 region of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene was amplified and sequenced from both RR-indox and WH-SS. An amino acid substitution from leucine (CTT) in WH-SS to phenylalanine (TTT) in RR-indox was observed at site 1014. These results show the resistance mechanisms of S. exigua to indoxacarb to be associated with glutathione S-transferase, carboxylesterase and a Leu-1014-Phe mutation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据