4.7 Article

Indigowood root extract protects hematopoietic cells, reduces tissue damage and modulates inflammatory cytokines after total-body irradiation: Does Indirubin play a role in radioprotection?

期刊

PHYTOMEDICINE
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1105-1111

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2009.05.011

关键词

Anti-inflammation; Hematopoiesis; Indigowood root; Isatis indigotica; Radioprotection; Indirubin

资金

  1. Committee on Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C. [CCMP93-RD-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radix of Isatis indigotica (indigowood root, IR) has been used in traditional medicine for its potential anti-inflammatory effect. The purpose of this study is to investigate THE radioprotective effects of radiation caused damages in hematopoietic system and normal tissues in mice. A total of 57 BALB/c mice were randomized into six treatment groups control, IR treatment (0.195, 0 585 and 1170 g/kg, p o. daily), L-glutamine (0.520 g/kg) and sham group. All mice except the sham group were irradiated and then administered for one week. The radioprotective effect on hematopoietic system, serum cytokines. and intestinal toxicity was studied. Protective effects on spleen and thymus are found in IR-treated groups. IR assisted in restoration of leukocytopenia after whole mice irradiation with significant reduction of serum TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IL-6 These enhancements of hematopoietic effects are due to an increase in the serum G-CSF concentration in IR treated groups In histopathological assessment, significant improvement of intestine toxicity is observed in high-dose IR and L-glutamine group Evidences show that IR has potentials to be a radioprotector, especially in recovery of hematopoietic system, reduction of inflammatory cytokines and intestinal toxicity. Indirubin may play a crucial role, but the underlying mechanism is not very clear and warrants further studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据