4.7 Article

Triterpenoidal saponins from the fruits of &ITGleditsia caspica&IT with proapoptotic properties

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 168-178

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.11.007

关键词

Gleditsia caspica; Fabaceae; Triterpenoidal saponins; Cytotoxicity; Apoptosis

资金

  1. National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH) King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia through Science and Technology Unit (STU) at Umm Al-Qura University [12-MED2310-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three previously undescribed oleanane-type triterpenoidal saponins named caspicaosides L-N were isolated from the fruits of Gleditsia caspica Desf. The aglycons of these saponins were echinocystic acid, erythrodiol and 12-oleanene-3,28,30-triol. Caspicaoside L is a bisdesmosidic saponin acylated with two monoterpenic acids. It has a disaccharide moiety made up of glucose and arabinose attached to C-3 and pentasaccharide moiety linked to C-28 made up of one glucose, 2 xyloses, one inner rhamnose and one terminal rhamnose which was acylated with two identical monoterpenic acids. Caspicaoside M is a monodesmosidic saponin with a trisaccharide moiety at C-3 made up of glucose, xylose and arabinose, while caspicaoside N has a disaccharide moiety at C-3 made up of glucose and arabinose. Their structures were determined by extensive 1D and 2D (DQF-COSY, HSQC, TOCSY, H-1-C-13-HSQC-TOCSY, HMBC, ROESY, NOESY) NMR, HRESIMS analyses and chemical degradation. The cytotoxicity MTT-based assay showed that caspicaosides M, N and L, respectively, exhibited high cytotoxic activity with IC50 <= 10 mu M (72 h) at least against one of the three used cancer cell lines, MCF 7, A2780 and HT 29; and were 2-34 folds selective against the normal fibroblasts (MRC 5). All compounds also induced apoptosis and caused G2/M arrest in MCF 7 cells (24 h); thus showing pro-apoptotic properties. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据