4.7 Article

Combining proteomics of root and shoot mitochondria and transcript analysis to define constitutive and variable components in plant mitochondria

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 72, 期 10, 页码 1092-1108

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.12.004

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; Proteomics; Mitochondria; TCA cycle; Photorespiration

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [CE0561495]
  2. WA State Government
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award
  4. ARC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria undertake respiration in plant cells, but through metabolic plasticity utilize differ proportions of substrates and deliver different proportions of products to cellular metabolic and biosynthetic pathways. In Arabidopsis the mitochondrial proteome from shoots and cell culture have been reported, but there has been little information on mitochondria in roots. We compare the root mitochondrial proteome with mitochondria isolated from photosynthetic shoots to define the role of protein abundance in these differences. The major differences observed were in the abundance and/or activities of enzymes in the TCA cycle and the mitochondrial enzymes involved in photorespiration. Metabolic pathways linked to TCA cycle and photorespiration were also altered, namely cysteine, formate and one-carbon metabolism, as well as amino acid metabolism focused on 2-oxoglutarate generation. Comparisons to microarray analysis of these same tissues showed a positive correlation between mRNA and mitochondrial protein abundance, but still ample evidence for the role of post-transcriptional processes in defining mitochondrial composition. Broader comparisons of transcript abundances for mitochondrial components across Arabidopsis tissues provided additional evidence for specialization of plant mitochondria, and clustering of these data in functional groups showed the constitutive vs variably expressed components of plant mitochondria. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据