4.5 Article

The Use of Coupled HSQC Spectra to Aid in Stereochemical Assignments of Molecules with Severe Proton Spectral Overlap

期刊

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 274-277

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pca.1354

关键词

NMR; 1H; 13?C; coupled HSQC; vicinal couplings; spectral overlap

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction - A simple glycoside with only 13 carbons exhibited extensive overlapping of four of the glycosidic protons, causing extreme difficulty in the determination of the stereochemistry of the pyranose unit. However, acquisition of a high-resolution coupled heteronuclear single-quantum coherence (HSQC) spectrum overcame this problem. This spectrum provides a useful method for determining vicinal proton coupling constants between strongly coupled protons. Objective - To show the potential of high-resolution coupled HSQC spectra in overcoming spectral overlap. Methodology - The sample was obtained by methanol extraction, followed by fractionation and column chromatography of the dried leaves of Montrichardia arborescens (Araceae). NMR spectra were obtained on 1.5 mg of sample dissolved in 120 mu L of CD3OD containing 0.1% trimethylsilyl (TMS) as internal standard. A gradient-selected HSQC spectrum was obtained using standard Varian library pulse sequences in phase sensitive mode. The high-resolution coupled HSQC spectrum focused on the saccharide region with a 1025 Hz H-1 spectral window, a 6300 Hz 13 C spectral window, 1024 data points, a 0.3 Hz relaxation delay, 384 time increments (linear predicted to 4096), and 80 scans per time increment. Results - The use of a high-resolution coupled HSQC spectrum allowed determination of the coupling patterns of the various pyranose protons with sufficient accuracy. This enabled completion of the assignments and identification of the pyranose unit as glucose. Conclusion - The study has shown the effectiveness of the use of a high-resolution coupled HSQC spectrum in the assignment of molecules with severe spectral overlap. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据