4.5 Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Flavonoids in Spirodela polyrrhiza by High-performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry

期刊

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 475-483

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pca.1303

关键词

Spirodela polyrrhiza (L.) Schleid.; quality control; flavonoid; HPLC/ESI-MS(n); Chinese herbal medicine

资金

  1. Peking University Health Science Center [985-2-119-121]
  2. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction - Spirodela polyrrhiza (L.) Schleid. is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of influenza. Despite its wide use in Chinese medicine, no report on quality control of this herb is available so far. Objective - To establish qualitative and quantitative analytical methods by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) for the quality control of S. polyrrhiza. Methodology - The methanol extract of S. polyrrhiza was analysed by HPLC/ESI-MS(n). Flavonoids were identified by comparing with reference standards or according to their MS(n) (n = 2-4) fragmentation behaviours. Based on LC/MS data, a standardised HPLC fingerprint was established by analysing 15 batches of commercial herbal samples. Furthermore, quantitative analysis was conducted by determining five major flavonoids, namely luteolin 8-C-glucoside, apigenin 8-C-glucoside, luteolin 7-O-glucoside, apigenin 7-O-glucoside and luteolin. Results - A total of 18 flavonoids were identified by LC/MS, and 14 of them were reported from this herb for the first time. The HPLC fingerprints contained 10 common peaks, and could differentiate good quality batches from counterfeits. The total contents of five major flavonoids in S. polyrrhiza varied significantly from 4.28 to 19.87 mg/g. Conclusion - Qualitative LC/MS and quantitative HPLC analytical methods were established for the comprehensive quality control of S. polyrrhiza. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据