4.5 Article

A Robust Sampling Approach for Identification and Quantification of Methyl Jasmonate in Leaf Tissue of Oilseed Rape for Analysis of Early Signaling in Sclerotinia Sclerotiorum Resistance

期刊

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 290-297

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pca.1199

关键词

Gas chromatography; film extraction; methyl jasmonate; sclerotinia sclerotiorum; oilseed rape

资金

  1. Major Research Foundation of National Science Foundation of China [90717101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction - Methyl jasmonate (MJA), which is a natrual hormonal regulator, is thought to be essential for the regulation of systemic defence responses. The information about MJA levels in plant tissues is helpful for the study of the disease resistance mechanism and genetically engineered cultivars with increased resistance. Therefore, the quantification of MJA levels in plant tissues by means of a sensitive and reliable method is of interest. Objective - Development of a film extraction method coupled with GC for determination of methyl jasmonate in leaf tisssue of oilseed rape for analysis of early signalling in sclerotinia sclerotiorum resistance. Methodology - A robust polydimethylsiloxane film was prepared and used for extraction of MJA in leaf tissues. By using in-solution extraction mode, optimum extraction efficiency was achieved with methanol-water (1:5, v/v) as extraction medium at 40 degrees C for 60 min. Results - Under the optimal conditions, a detection limit of 0.2 ng/mL was achieved. Excellent reproducibility was found over a linear range of 1-1000 ng/mL. MJA in leaves infected by sclerotinia sclerotiorum was determined, with the results showing that basal levels of MJA (15 ng/g) were present in noninfested controls, but increased to 313 ng/g 10 h after fungal attack. Conclusion - The film extraction method is a simple, rapid and inexpensive sampling technique for determination of endogenous MJA in plant tissues that can be applied to most plants. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据