4.5 Article

Comparing the Composition and Bioactivity of Crataegus Monogyna Flowers and Fruits used in Folk Medicine

期刊

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 181-188

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pca.1267

关键词

Crataegus monogyna; Flowers and fruits; Composition; Bioactivity; Portuguese Ethnoflora

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (Portugal) [SFRH/BPD/4609/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction - Studying local plant foods is of particular interest as they often contain high amounts of bioactive compounds. Furthermore, their nutritional and medicinal impact must be documented and supported with scientific studies. Crataegus monogyna is an example of 'functional food' traditionally used all over South European countries. Objective - A complete chemical and bioactive characterization of flower buds, flowers, unripe, ripened and over ripened fruits was performed. Methodology - Chemical characterization included determination of proteins, fats, ash, and carbohydrates, particularly sugars by HPLC-RI, fatty acids by GC-FID, tocopherols by HPLC-fluorescence, phenolics, flavonoids, beta-carotene and ascorbic acid, by spectrophotometric techniques. Bioactivity was evaluated through screening of antioxidant properties: radical scavenging effects, reducing power, and inhibition of lipid peroxidation. Results - Flowers revealed the highest tocopherols and ascorbic acid contents, as also the best n-6/n-3 fatty acids ratio. Over ripened fruits showed the highest levels of carbohydrates, sugars and SFA. Unripe fruits presented the highest PUFA contents with the best PUFA/SFA ratio, as also the highest levels of phenolics and the most promising antioxidant properties (EC50 < 20.83 mu g/ml; even better than trolox). Conclusion - This study shows the potential of different parts of Crataegus monogyna as sources of several compounds, including nutrients and nutraceuticals. Moreover, it supports the documented nutritional and medicinal impact of this species. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据