4.4 Article

Dose-response effects of medical exercise therapy in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomised controlled clinical trial

期刊

PHYSIOTHERAPY
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 126-131

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.05.009

关键词

Patellofemoral pain syndrome; Exercise; Dose-response; Pain; Function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To evaluate two different therapeutic exercise regimens in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Design Multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial. Setting Three primary healthcare physiotherapy clinics. Participants Forty-two patients with PFPS were assigned at random to an experimental group or a control group. Forty participants completed the study. Interventions Both groups received three treatments per week for 12 weeks. The experimental group received high-dose, high-repetition medical exercise therapy, and the control group received low-dose, low-repetition exercise therapy. The groups differed in terms of number of exercises, number of repetitions and sets, and time spent performing aerobic/global exercises. Main outcome measures Outcome parameters were pain (measured using a visual analogue scale) and function [measured using the step-down test and the modified Functional Index Questionnaire (FIQ)]. Results At baseline, there were no differences between the groups. After the interventions, there were statistically significant (P < 0.05) and clinically important differences between the groups for all outcome parameters, all in favour of the experimental group: -1.6 for mean pain [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.4 to -0.8], 6.5 for step-down test (95% CI 3.8 to 9.2) and 3.1 for FIQ (95% CI 1.2 to 5.0). Conclusion The results indicate that exercise therapy has a dose response effect on pain and functional outcomes in patients with PFPS. This indicates that high-dose, high-repetition medical exercise therapy is more efficacious than low-dose, low-repetition exercise therapy for this patient group. (c) 2012 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据