4.5 Article

Sweet taste and chorda tympani transection alter capsaicin-induced lingual pain perception in adult human subjects

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 368-373

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.09.004

关键词

Pain suppression; Sweet taste; Oral pain; Hemiageusia; gLMS; Hedonics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sweetness signals the nutritional value of food and may moreover be accompanied by a sensory suppression that leads to higher pain tolerance.This effect is well documented in infant rats and humans. However, it is still debated whether sensory suppression is also present in adult humans. Thus, we investigated the effects of sweet taste on the perception of the painful trigeminal stimulus capsaicin in two groups of healthy adult human subjects. A solution of 100 mu M capsaicin was applied to the tip of the subject's tongues in order to stimulate trigeminal A delta- and C-fiber nociceptors. When swallowed, 1 M sucrose reduced the capsaicin-induced burning sensation by 29% (p <=.0.05) whereas a solution of similar taste intensity containing 1 mu M quinine did not. Similarly, sucrose application to the frontal hemitongue suppressed the perception of the burning sensation induced by contralaterally applied capsaicin by 25% (p not greater than or equal to-.0.01). We furthermore investigated the effects of documented unilateral transection of the chorda tympani nerve on capsaicin perception. In accordance with the ipsi-to-contralateral effect of sucrose on capsaicin perception in healthy subjects, hemiageusic subjects were more sensitive for capsaicin on the tongue contralateral to the taste nerve lesion (+38%; p not greater than or equal to 0.01).Taken together, these results argue I) for the existence of food intake-induced sensory suppression, if not analgesia, in adult humans and II) a centrally mediated suppression of trigeminal sensation by taste inputs that III) becomes disinhibited upon peripheral taste nerve lesion. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据