4.5 Article

Anxiolytic-like effects induced by medial prefrontal cortex inhibition in rats submitted to the Vogel conflict test

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 93, 期 1-2, 页码 200-205

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.08.009

关键词

infra limbic cortex; anxiolytic-like effects; CoCl2; Vogel conflict test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conflicting results have been obtained in studies aimed at investigating the role of the ventral portion of the medial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC), which comprise the prelimbic cortex (PL) and infralimbic cortex (IL), on anxiety responses in rodents evoked by animal models such as fear conditioning, elevated plus maze or social interaction. This may reflect the use of different lesion techniques and/or experimental paradigms based on distinct behaviors properties. Among the latter, the Vogel punished-licking test has been widely used to measure anxiety. However, the role of the vMPFC on anxiety-like behavior evoked by the Vogel model has not been evaluated. Thus, the present study verified the effects of acute and reversible bilateral inhibition of the vMPFC on the behavioral responses in the Vogel conflict test. After 24 h of water deprivation, male Wistar rats were subjected to an initial 3-min non-punished (pretest) drinking session. After an additional 24-h period of water deprivation they were exposed to a 3-min punished-licking session (test). Bilateral microinjections of lidocaine 2% (200 nL) or CoCl2 (1 mM/200 nL) into the PL or IL produced similar anticonflict effects, increasing the number of punished licks. No responses were observed when lidocaine 2% was microinjected into vMPFC surrounding structures such as the cingulate cortex area 1, the corpus callosum and the tenia tecta. In control experiments the drugs did not change the number of unpunished licks nor had any effect in the tail-flick test. The present results, therefore, indicate that the vMPFC is involved in the behavioral responses elicited by punished stimuli. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据