4.6 Review

Mammalian Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: From Structure to Function

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 73-120

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2008

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [NS-25296]
  2. National Institutes of Health CounterACT Program through NINDS [U01-NS-59344]
  3. United States Army Research Office Contract [W911NF-06-1-0098]
  4. National Institute of Aging [AG-17517]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [PO1-HL-72903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Albuquerque EX, Pereira EFR, Alkondon M, Rogers SW. Mammalian Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: From Structure to Function. Physiol Rev 89: 73-120, 2009; doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2008. - The classical studies of nicotine by Langley at the turn of the 20th century introduced the concept of a receptive substance, from which the idea of a receptor came to light. Subsequent studies aided by the Torpedo electric organ, a rich source of muscle-type nicotinic receptors (nAChRs), and the discovery of alpha-bungarotoxin, a snake toxin that binds pseudo- irreversibly to the muscle nAChR, resulted in the muscle nAChR being the best characterized ligand- gated ion channel hitherto. With the advancement of functional and genetic studies in the late 1980s, the existence of nAChRs in the mammalian brain was confirmed and the realization that the numerous nAChR subtypes contribute to the psychoactive properties of nicotine and other drugs of abuse and to the neuropathology of various diseases, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and schizophrenia, has since emerged. This review provides a comprehensive overview of these findings and the more recent revelations of the impact that the rich diversity in function and expression of this receptor family has on neuronal and nonneuronal cells throughout the body. Despite these numerous developments, our understanding of the contributions of specific neuronal nAChR subtypes to the many facets of physiology throughout the body remains in its infancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据