4.6 Review

Aneuploidy: From a Physiological Mechanism of Variance to Down Syndrome

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 887-920

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacion R. Areces, FIS [PI082038]
  2. Genoma Espana [GEN2003-20651-C06-03]
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  4. Region Centre,
  5. Conseil General du Loiret.
  6. AnEUploidy [LSHG-CT-2006-037627]
  7. European Union
  8. Fondation Jerome Lejeune
  9. [SAF-2004-02808]
  10. [SAF2007-60827]
  11. [SAF2007-31093-E]
  12. [Marato TV3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dierssen M, Herault Y, Estivill X. Aneuploidy: From a Physiological Mechanism of Variance to Down Syndrome. Physiol Rev 89: 887-920, 2009; doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2007.-Quantitative differences in gene expression emerge as a significant source of variation in natural populations, representing an important substrate for evolution and accounting for a considerable fraction of phenotypic diversity. However, perturbation of gene expression is also the main factor in determining the molecular pathogenesis of numerous aneuploid disorders. In this review, we focus on Down syndrome (DS) as the prototype of genomic disorder induced by copy number change. The understanding of the pathogenicity of the extra genomic material in trisomy 21 has accelerated in the last years due to the recent advances in genome sequencing, comparative genome analysis, functional genome exploration, and the use of model organisms. We present recent data on the role of genome-altering processes in the generation of diversity in DS neural phenotypes focusing on the impact of trisomy on brain structure and mental retardation and on biological pathways and cell types in target brain regions (including prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, and basal ganglia). We also review the potential that genetically engineered mouse models of DS bring into the understanding of the molecular biology of human learning disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据