4.5 Article

Nonlinear measure of synchrony between blood oxygen saturation and heart rate from nocturnal pulse oximetry in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 967-982

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/9/008

关键词

obstructive sleep apnoea; nocturnal pulse oximetry; blood oxygen saturation; heart rate; synchrony; magnitude squared coherence; nonlinear analysis; cross-approximate entropy

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  2. FEDER [TEC 2008-02241]
  3. Consejeria de Sanidad de la Junta de Castilla y Leon [SAN/673/VA03/08]
  4. Sociedad Castellano-Leonesa y Cantabra de Patologia Respiratoria (SOCALPAR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on analysis of the relationship between changes in blood oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) and heart rate (HR) recordings from nocturnal pulse oximetry (NPO) in patients suspected of suffering from obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) syndrome. Two different analyses were developed: a classical frequency analysis based on the magnitude squared coherence ( MSC) and a nonlinear analysis by means of a recently developed measure of synchrony, the cross-approximate entropy (cross-ApEn). A data set of 187 subjects was studied. We found significantly higher correlation and synchrony between oximetry signals from OSA positive patients compared with OSA negative subjects. We assessed the diagnostic ability to detect OSA syndrome of both the classical and nonlinear approaches by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses with tenfold cross-validation. The nonlinear measure of synchrony significantly improved the results obtained with classical MSC: 69.2% sensitivity, 90.9% specificity and 78.1% accuracy were reached with MSC, whereas 83.7% sensitivity, 84.3% specificity and 84.0% accuracy were obtained with cross-ApEn. Our results suggest that the use of nonlinear measures of synchrony could provide essential information from oximetry signals, which cannot be obtained with classical spectral analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据