4.2 Article

Effects of group size on aggregation against desiccation in woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea)

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 165-171

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phen.12060

关键词

Cluster; group size; Porcellio scaber; terrestrial isopods; water loss rate

资金

  1. FRIA grant (Fonds pour la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture, FRS-FNRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aggregation in terrestrial isopods, a behaviour that results in the formation of dense clusters, is readily accepted as a mechanism of resistance to desiccation. Thus, aggregation is considered to be an adaptation to terrestrial life in this fully terrestrial suborder of crustaceans. In the present study of Porcellio scaber Latreille, a cosmopolitan species, individual water loss is investigated experimentally as a function of the size of the aggregates and, for the first time, over a large range of group sizes (groups of 1, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 individuals). From the perspective of an isolated individual, aggregation behaviour is effective in reducing the rate of water loss whatever the group size, and reduces the individual water loss rate by more than half in large groups. However, the water loss rate of an individual follows a power law according to group size. Accordingly, if the addition of individuals to small groups strongly reduces the water losses per individual, adding individuals to large groups only slightly reduces the individual water losses. Thus, the successful reduction of the water loss rate by this aggregation behaviour is confirmed, although only up to a certain limit, particularly if the number of individuals per aggregate exceeds 50-60 under the experimental conditions used in the present study. Moreover, the individual surface area exposed to the air, as a function of group size, follows a similar pattern (i.e. a similar power law). Thus, a geometrical explanation is proposed for the nonlinear water losses in woodlice aggregates. These results are discussed in relation to the group sizes observed both in the laboratory and the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据