4.2 Article

Genetic and hormonal control of melanization in reddish-brown and albino mutants in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 2-8

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2009.00690.x

关键词

Body colouration; density-dependent phase polyphenism; [His7]-corazonin; locust; mutant; Schistocerca gregaria

资金

  1. JSPS
  2. Kakenhi grant [19380039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic and hormonal control of body colouration is investigated using two recessive genetic mutant strains, the reddish-brown (RB) mutant and an albino mutant, as well as a normal (pigmented) strain of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. The colour patterns of the RB nymphs are similar to those of a normal strain, although the intensity of the melanization is weaker in the former. Reciprocal crosses between the RB and albino mutants produce only normal phenotypes in the F-1 generation. In the F-2 generation, the normal, RB and albino phenotypes appear in a ratio of 9 : 3 : 4, indicating that two Mendelian units might determine the appearance of dark body colour and the intensity of melanization, respectively. In other words, at least two steps of regulation might be involved in the expression of body colour. Injections of [His7]-corazonin, a neuropeptide inducing dark colour in this locust, fail to induce dark colour in albino nymphs but show a dose-dependent darkening in RB nymphs in the range, 10 pmol to 1 nmol. Some RB nymphs become indistinguishable from normal individuals after injection of the peptide. Implantation of corpora cardiaca (CC) taken from RB mutants into other RB individuals induces darkening in the latter and CC from RB, albino and normal strains have similar dark colour-inducing activity when implanted into albino Locusta migratoria. These results suggest the possibility that the RB mutant gene regulates the intensity of melanization, possibly through controlling the pathway of pigment biosynthesis associated with [His7]-corazonin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据