4.2 Article

Identification of host-plant chemical stimuli for the European grape berry moth Eupoecilia ambiguella

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 101-110

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2010.00766.x

关键词

Electroantennogram; Eupoecilia ambiguella; European grape berry moth; host-plant volatiles; pheromone; sensory ecology

资金

  1. Swiss Innovation Promotion Agency [7273.1 LSPP-LS2]
  2. National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Plant Survival
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olfaction is of major importance for survival and reproduction in moths. Males possess highly specific and sensitive olfactory receptor neurones to detect female sex pheromones. However, the capacity of male moths to respond to host-plant volatiles is relatively neglected and the role that such responses could play in the sensory ecology of moths is still not fully understood. The present study aims to identify host-plant stimuli for the European grape berry moth Eupoecilia ambiguella Hb. (Tortricidae, Lepidoptera), a major pest of vine in Europe. Headspace volatiles from Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot Noir, Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris and five other host-plant species comprising five different families are analyzed by gas chromatography linked to electroantennogram (EAG) recording from male E. ambiguella antennae and by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. This procedure identifies 32 EAG-active compounds, among them the aliphatic compounds 1-hexanol, (Z)-3-hexenol, (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate and 1-octen-3-ol; the terpenes limonene, beta-caryophyllene and (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene; and the aromatic compounds benzaldehyde and methyl salicylate. Male and female E. ambiguella show similar EAG response amplitudes to individual chemical stimuli and also to mixtures of plant volatiles, as represented by essential oils from ten other plant species. This possibly indicates a common role for plant compounds in the sensory ecology of the two sexes of E. ambiguella.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据