4.2 Article

Control of the release of digestive enzymes in the caeca of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 144-151

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00665.x

关键词

allatostatin; aminopeptidase; amylase; diets; lipase; nutrients; trypsin

资金

  1. M. Meyering-Vos [DFG ME 2034/1-3]
  2. D. Lwalaba [DAAD A/06/33259]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Gryllus bimaculatus, more digestive enzymes (amylase, trypsin, aminopeptidase) are secreted in the caecum of fed crickets than in unfed crickets, but the enzymes are released continuously at a basal rate in unfed animals. The rate of synthesis of the enzymes appears to parallel their rate of release. Digestive enzymes are released in response to a specific ratio of nutrients, although a high nutrient component in the food does not necessarily induce a high digestive enzyme release for that component. Rinsed flat-sheet preparations of the caecum are incubated with specific nutrients (carbohydrates and proteins) and various concentrations of a neuropeptide (type-A allatostatin), which affects generally the basal rates of secretion. Both maltose and glucose increase the release of amylase in vitro, but starch produces an inhibition of amylase release at lower concentrations. Bovine serum albumin (BSA), peptone and a mixture of amino acids have almost no effect on the release of aminopeptidase or carboxypeptidase, and only low concentrations of peptone increase trypsin release. High concentrations of both BSA and peptone strongly inhibit trypsin activity, perhaps by excess substrate binding to the trypsin active site. The allatostatin Grybi-AST 5 elevates the release of amylase in vitro, but not of trypsin or aminopeptidase, in 2-day-old fed females. In the caeca from 1-day-old unfed crickets, both amylase and the trypsin release are stimulated in the presence of AST 5. The paracrine AST 5 is probably released from the gut endocrine cells and binds to the enzyme-producing caecal cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据