4.5 Article

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and entomopathogenic fungus bioformulation enhance the expression of defense enzymes and pathogenesis-related proteins in groundnut plants against leafminer insect and collar rot pathogen

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2012.12.002

关键词

Aproaerema modicella; Arachis hypogaea; Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins; Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria; Sclerotium rolfsii

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bioformulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf1 and TDK1) and Beauveria bassiana (B2) strains was evaluated individually and in combinations with and without chitin for their efficacy against leafminer insect and collar rot disease and the effect of the interaction between Pseudomonas, Beauveria and groundnut leafminer insect and collar rot pathogen in the expression of defense enzymes and pathogenesis-related proteins (PR-proteins) in groundnut. Among the various bioformulations, B2 + TDK1 + Pf1 (amended with or without chitin) formulation significantly reduced the incidence of leafminer and collar rot disease when compared to untreated control. A significant increase in the enzymatic activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, superoxide dismutase, catalase, lipoxygenase, and phenolics in groundnut plants treated with B2 + TDK1 + Pf1 bioformulation (amended with or without chitin) and challenge inoculated with Aproaerema modicella and Sclerotium rolfsii. Native gel electrophoresis also revealed the expression of more isoforms of pathogenesis-related proteins and other defense enzymes viz., polyphenol oxidase and superoxide dismutase in plants treated with B2 + TDK1 + Pf1 mixture challenged with A. modicella and S. rolfsii. The present study reveals that sustained and timely induction and accumulation of these defense enzymes and PR-proteins enhance the resistance in groundnut against leafminer insect and collar rot disease. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据