4.5 Article

Virulence, sporulation, and elicitin production in three clonal lineages of Phytophthora ramorum

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 74, 期 5-6, 页码 317-322

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2010.04.008

关键词

Sudden oak death; Plant disease; Rhododendron; qPCR; ELISA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytophthora ramorum populations are clonal and consist of three lineages. Recent studies have shown that the clonal lineages may have varying degrees of aggressiveness on some host species, such as Quercus rubra. In this study, we examined virulence, sporulation and elicitin production of five P. ramorum isolates from each of the three clonal lineages. Virulence (lesion size) and sporulation (sporangia production) were determined on wound-inoculated detached leaves of Rhododendron catawbiense 'Nova Zembla'. Lesion area differed between the clonal lineages (p < 0.001) with the EU1 and NA2 isolates producing significantly greater lesion areas than did NA1 isolates on inoculated leaves (approx. 4.2, 3.6, and 0.8 cm(2) respectively). Similarly, lineages EU1 and NA2 produced significantly more sporangia per leaf (p < 0.001) than did lineage NA1 (approx. 800, 1000, and 300 sporangia per leaf respectively). Real-time PCR assays detected expression of the class I elicitins (ram-alpha 1 and ram-alpha 2) in all 15 isolates. Of the two elicitins, only the ram-alpha 2 differed between lineage (p < 0.0001) with nearly 2-fold higher levels of expression in the EU1 and NA2 lineages as compared to the NA1 lineage. Ram-alpha 2 expression showed a positive linear relationship with isolate virulence or lesion size (R(2) = 0.707). A significant, positive, linear relationship was also observed between ram-alpha 2 expression and sporulation although it was not as strong (R(2) = 0.209). In summary, isolates belonging to clonal lineages EU1 and NA2 are generally more virulent, produce more sporangia, and produce more ram-alpha 2 elicitin in vitro than isolates belonging to lineage NA1. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据