4.7 Article

Root herbivory: molecular analysis of the maize transcriptome upon infestation by Southern corn rootworm, Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi

期刊

PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
卷 144, 期 4, 页码 303-319

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01557.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While many studies have characterized changes to the transcriptome of plants attacked by shoot-eating insect pests, few have examined transcriptome-level effects of root pests. Maize (Zea mays) seedlings were subjected to infestation for approximately 2 weeks by the root herbivore southern corn rootworm (SCR) Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi, and changes in transcript abundance within both roots and shoots were analyzed using a 57K element microarray. A total of 541 genes showed statistically significant changes in transcript abundance in infested roots, including genes encoding many pathogenesis-related proteins such as chitinases, proteinase inhibitors, peroxidases and beta-1,3-glucanases. Several WRKY transcription factors often associated with biotic responses exhibited increased transcript abundance upon SCR feeding. Differentially expressed (DE) genes were also detected in shoots of infested vs control plants. Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) was used to confirm patterns of transcript abundance for several significant DE genes using an independent experiment with a 26 day period of SCR infestation. Because of the well-documented roles that jasmonic acid (JA) or salicylic acid (SA) play in herbivory responses, the effect of exogenous JA or SA application on transcript abundance corresponding to the same subset of SCR-responsive genes was assessed. The response of these genes at the level of transcript abundance to SA and JA differed between roots and shoots and also differed among the genes that were examined. These data suggested that SA- and JA-dependent and independent signals contributed to the transcriptome-level changes in maize roots and shoots in response to SCR infestation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据