4.7 Article

Physiological and biochemical parameters controlling waterlogging stress tolerance in Prunus before and after drainage

期刊

PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
卷 144, 期 4, 页码 357-368

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01568.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Government of Aragon [RTA-08-0086, A12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waterlogging is associated with poor soil drainage. As a consequence oxygen levels decrease in the root environment inducing root asphyxia and affecting plant growth. Some plants can survive under these conditions triggering complex anatomical and biochemical adaptations, mostly in the roots. Long- and short-term responses to waterlogging stress were compared in two trials using a set of two myrobalans (Prunus cerasifera Erhr), P.2175 and P.2980, as tolerant rootstocks and two almond x peach [Prunus amygdalus Batsch x Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] interspecific hybrids, Garnem and Felinem, as sensitive ones in two consecutive years. Stomatal conductance and chlorophyll content were measured in the long-term trials to assess survival performance, while the enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1), guaiacol peroxidase (POD, EC 1.11.1.7), and catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) were measured in the short-term trials to study early antioxidant response. The incidence of the stress in the root environment was different as a result of the different plant development at the moment of the treatment, as a consequence of different environmental conditions both before and during the treatment between the 2 years. The activity of the different enzymes was higher in the sensitive genotype Felinem than in the tolerant P.2175. This result shows an activation of the antioxidant system and has been observed to depend of the different nature of the roots between the 2 years. As the antioxidant enzymes seem to work more efficiently when roots are more aerated, we cannot conclude that they are responsible for the higher tolerance observed in the myrobalan plums.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据