4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Improving the hot-spot pressure and demonstrating ignition hydrodynamic equivalence in cryogenic deuterium-tritium implosions on OMEGA

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4876618

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0001944]
  2. University of Rochester
  3. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaching ignition in direct-drive (DD) inertial confinement fusion implosions requires achieving central pressures in excess of 100 Gbar. The OMEGA laser system [T. R. Boehly et al., Opt. Commun. 133, 495 (1997)] is used to study the physics of implosions that are hydrodynamically equivalent to the ignition designs on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) [J. A. Paisner et al., Laser Focus World 30, 75 (1994)]. It is shown that the highest hot-spot pressures (up to 40 Gbar) are achieved in target designs with a fuel adiabat of alpha similar or equal to 4, an implosion velocity of 3.8 x 10(7) cm/s, and a laser intensity of similar to 10(15) W/cm(2). These moderate-adiabat implosions are well understood using two-dimensional hydrocode simulations. The performance of lower-adiabat implosions is significantly degraded relative to code predictions, a common feature between DD implosions on OMEGA and indirect-drive cryogenic implosions on the NIF. Simplified theoretical models are developed to gain physical understanding of the implosion dynamics that dictate the target performance. These models indicate that degradations in the shell density and integrity (caused by hydrodynamic instabilities during the target acceleration) coupled with hydrodynamics at stagnation are the main failure mechanisms in low-adiabat designs. To demonstrate ignition hydrodynamic equivalence in cryogenic implosions on OMEGA, the target-design robustness to hydrodynamic instability growth must be improved by reducing laser-coupling losses caused by cross beam energy transfer. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据