4.8 Article

Microbial community response of nitrifying sequencing batch reactors to silver, zero-valent iron, titanium dioxide and cerium dioxide nanomaterials

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 87-97

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.008

关键词

Environmental impacts of nanomaterials; Waste water treatment; Nitrification; Pyrosequencing; q-PCR

资金

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Star Grant [834856]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (CEINT) [EF-0830093]
  3. Microbiology in the Post-Genome Era NSF REU site at Virginia Tech (NSF) [1156954]
  4. Virginia Tech Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As nanomaterials in consumer products increasingly enter wastewater treatment plants, there is concern that they may have adverse effects on biological wastewater treatment. Effects of silver (nanoAg), zero-valent iron (NZVI), titanium dioxide (nanoTiO(2)) and cerium dioxide (nanoCeO(2)) nanomaterials on nitrification and microbial community structure were examined in duplicate lab-scale nitrifying sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) relative to control SBRs that received no nanomaterials or ionic/bulk analogs. Nitrification function was not measurably inhibited in the SBRs by any of the materials as dosing was initiated at 0.1 mg/L and sequentially increased every 14 days to 1, 10, and 20 mg/L. However, SBRs rapidly lost nitrification function when the Ag+ experiment was repeated at a continuous high load of 20 mg/L. Shifts in microbial community structure and decreased microbial diversity were associated with both sequential and high loading of nanoAg and Ag+ with more pronounced effects for Ag+. Bacteroidetes became more dominant in SBRs dosed with Ag+, while Proteobacteria became more dominant in SBRs dosed with nanoAg. The two forms of silver also had distinct effects on specific bacterial genera. A decrease in nitrification gene markers (amoA) was observed in SBRs dosed with nanoAg and Ag+. In contrast, impacts of NZVI, nanoTiO(2), nanoCeO(2) and their analogs on microbial community structure and nitrification gene markers were limited. TEM-EDS analysis indicated that a large portion of nanoAg remained dispersed in the activated sludge and formed Ag-S complexes, while NZVI, nanoTiO(2) and nanoCeO(2) were mostly aggregated and chemically unmodified. Overall, this study suggests a high threshold of the four nanomaterials in terms of exerting adverse effects on nitrification function. However, distinct microbial community responses to nanoAg indicate potential long-term effects. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据