4.4 Article

Freely decaying turbulence in two-dimensional electrostatic gyrokinetics

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4769029

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. DOE Center for Multiscale Plasma Dynamics
  2. Leverhulme Trust International Network for Magnetised Plasma Turbulence
  3. Wolfgang Pauli Institute
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [24540533]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24540533] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In magnetized plasmas, a turbulent cascade occurs in phase space at scales smaller than the thermal Larmor radius (sub-Larmor scales) [Tatsuno et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 015003 (2009)]. When the turbulence is restricted to two spatial dimensions perpendicular to the background magnetic field, two independent cascades may take place simultaneously because of the presence of two collisionless invariants. In the present work, freely decaying turbulence of two-dimensional electrostatic gyrokinetics is investigated by means of phenomenological theory and direct numerical simulations. A dual cascade (forward and inverse cascades) is observed in velocity space as well as in position space, which we diagnose by means of nonlinear transfer functions for the collisionless invariants. We find that the turbulence tends to a time-asymptotic state, dominated by a single scale that grows in time. A theory of this asymptotic state is derived in the form of decay laws. Each case that we study falls into one of three regimes (weakly collisional, marginal, and strongly collisional), determined by a dimensionless number D*, a quantity analogous to the Reynolds number. The marginal state is marked by a critical number D* = D-0 that is preserved in time. Turbulence initialized above this value become increasingly inertial in time, evolving toward larger and larger D*; turbulence initialized below D0 become more and more collisional, decaying to progressively smaller D*. (C) 2012 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4769029]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据