4.4 Article

Time-dependent 2-D modeling of edge plasma transport with high intermittency due to blobs

期刊

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4739464

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy at UCSD [DE-FG02-08ER54989]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy at LLNL [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results on time-dependent 2-D fluid modeling of edge plasmas with non-diffusive intermittent transport across the magnetic field (termed cross-field) based on the novel macro-blob approach are presented. The capability of this approach to simulate the long temporal evolution (similar to 0.1 s) of the background plasma and simultaneously the fast spatiotemporal dynamics of blobs (similar to 10(-4) s) is demonstrated. An analysis of a periodic sequence of many macro-blobs (PSMB) is given showing that the resulting plasma attains a dynamic equilibrium. Plasma properties in the dynamic equilibrium are discussed. In PSMB modeling, the effect of macro-blob generation frequency on edge plasma parameters is studied. Comparison between PSMB modeling and experimental profile data is given. The calculations are performed for the same plasma discharge using two different models for anomalous cross-field transport: time-average convection and PSMB. Parametric analysis of edge plasma variation with transport coefficients in these models is presented. The capability of the models to accurately simulate enhanced transport due to blobs is compared. Impurity dynamics in edge plasma with macro-blobs is also studied showing strong impact of macro-blob on profiles of impurity charge states caused by enhanced outward transport of high-charge states and simultaneous inward transport of low-charge states towards the core. Macro-blobs cause enhancement of sputtering rates, increase radiation and impurity concentration in plasma, and change erosion/deposition patterns. (C) 2012 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4739464]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据