4.7 Article

Predicting longevity of submerged superhydrophobic surfaces with parallel grooves

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4811830

关键词

-

资金

  1. VCU Presidential Research Incentive Program (PRIP)
  2. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1029924, CHE 1213814]
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1213814] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1029924] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mathematical framework is developed to predict the longevity of a submerged superhydrophobic surface made up of parallel grooves. Time-dependent integro-differential equations predicting the instantaneous behavior of the air-water interface are derived by applying the balance of forces across the air-water interface, while accounting for the dissolution of the air in water over time. The calculations start by producing a differential equation for the initial steady-state shape and equilibrium position of the air-water interface at t = 0. Analytical and/or numerical solutions are then developed to solve the time-dependent equations and to compute the volume of the trapped air in the grooves over time until a Wenzel state is reached as the interface touches the groove's bottom. For demonstration, a superhydrophobic surface made of parallel grooves is considered, and the influence of the groove's dimensions on the longevity of the surface under different hydrostatic pressures is studied. It was found that for grooves with higher width-to-depth ratios, the critical pressure (pressure at which departure from the Cassie state starts) is higher due to stronger resistance to deflection of the air-water interface from the air trapped in such grooves. However, grooves with higher width-to-depth ratios reach the Wenzel state faster because of their greater air-water interface areas. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据