4.7 Article

Bi-stability in the turbulent wake past parallelepiped bodies with various aspect ratios and wall effects

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4820372

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The turbulent wake past parallelepiped bodies with a rectangular blunt trailing edge of height H and width W is investigated in wall proximity: various aspect ratios H* = H/W is an element of [0.51, 1.63] and ground clearances C* = C/W is an element of [0, 1.00] are explored at a Reynolds number of 4.5 x 10(4) based on the body width W. Base pressure measurements and particle image velocimetry show that the close wake often undergoes antisymmetric instabilities that can be either in the lateral direction (parallel to the wall) or in the vertical direction (normal to the wall). The instantaneous wake presents preferred states with high degrees of asymmetry; in some configurations, topology shifts are observed after long time scales T-l similar to 10(3)W/U-0 leading to bistable behaviors. The effect of ground proximity is thoroughly studied for H* = 0.74 corresponding to the reference Ahmed geometry and for a case with a height dimension larger than its width H* = 1/0.74 = 1.34. When C* > 0.08, it is found that the Ahmed body is bistable in the lateral direction while the wake past the second geometry develops an instability in the vertical direction. In both cases, the instabilities vanish for sufficiently small values of ground clearance (C* < 0.08) which are associated with the apparition of a detachment of the underbody flow on the ground. However, the wall proximity does not necessarily stabilize the wake in the plane of symmetry since the flow retrieves the bi-stability in the lateral direction for C* < 0.03 and H* < 0.65. A general criterion for the existence of the instabilities is deduced from the parametric study in the domain (H*, C*) together with symmetry considerations. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据