4.7 Article

Isospin properties of electric dipole excitations in 48Ca

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 730, 期 -, 页码 288-292

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.050

关键词

Low-lying electric dipole excitations; Ca-48; Isospin character

资金

  1. DFG [ZI 510/4-2, SFB 634]
  2. European Commission [RII3-CT-2004-506065]
  3. Alliance Program of the Helmholtz Association [HA216/EMMI]
  4. Helmholtz International Center for FAIR (HIC for FAIR)
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-97ER41033]
  6. Rare Isotope Science Project of the Institute for Basic Science
  7. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013M7A1A1075766]
  9. Bonn-Cologne Graduate School of Physics and Astronomy
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Physics [1306250] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Physics
  13. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1002478] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013M7A1A1075766] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two different experimental approaches were combined to study the electric dipole strength in the doubly-magic nucleus Ca-48 below the neutron threshold. Real-photon scattering experiments using bremsstrahlung up to 9.9 MeV and nearly mono-energetic linearly polarized photons with energies between 6.6 and 9.51 MeV provided strength distribution and parities, and an (alpha, alpha'gamma) experiment at E-alpha = 136 MeV gave cross sections for an isoscalar probe. The unexpected difference observed in the dipole response is compared to calculations using the first-order random-phase approximation and points to an energy-dependent isospiu character. A strong isoscalar state at 7.6 MeV was identified for the first time supporting a recent theoretical prediction. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据