4.7 Article

Search for the K-pp bound state via γd → K+π-X reaction at Eγ=1.5-2.4 GeV

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 728, 期 -, 页码 616-621

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.12.039

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan
  2. GCOE program in Kyoto University
  3. National Science Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A1A01011926]
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-0244999]
  6. Foreign Researchers from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A1A01011926] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [0969297, 1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Physics
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1306137] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24740164, 24105003, 21105003, 24540305] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A search for the K- pp bound state (the lightest kaonic nucleus) has been performed using the gamma d > K+pi X- reaction at E-gamma= 1.5-2.4 GeV at LEPS/SPring-8. The differential cross section of the K+pi(-) photo-production off deuterium (d(2)sigma/d cos theta(lab)(K+)/d cos theta(lab)(pi-)) has been measured for the first time in this energy region. A peak structure was searched for in the inclusive missing mass spectrum. A statistically significant peak structure was not observed in the region from 2.22 to 2.36 GeV/c(2). The upper limits of the differential cross section of the K- pp bound state production were determined to be (0.17-0.55), (0.55-1.7) and (1.1-2.9) mu b at 95% confidence level with the assumed widths of 20 MeV, 60 MeV and 100 MeV. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据