4.7 Article

Search for a non-standard-model Higgs boson decaying to a pair of new light bosons in four-muon final states

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 726, 期 4-5, 页码 564-586

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.009

关键词

LHC; CMS; Higgs; Supersymmetry; NMSSM; Muons

资金

  1. FMSR (Austria)
  2. FNRS (Belgium)
  3. FWO (Belgium)
  4. CNPq (Brazil)
  5. CAPES (Brazil)
  6. FAPERJ (Brazil)
  7. FAPESP (Brazil)
  8. MES (Bulgaria)
  9. CERN
  10. CAS (China)
  11. MoST (China)
  12. NSFC (China)
  13. COLCIENCIAS (Colombia)
  14. MSES (Croatia)
  15. RPF (Cyprus)
  16. Academy of Sciences (Estonia)
  17. NICPB (Estonia)
  18. Academy of Finland (Finland)
  19. MEC (Finland)
  20. HIP (Finland)
  21. CEA (France)
  22. CNRS/IN2P3 (France)
  23. BMBF (Germany)
  24. DFG (Germany)
  25. HGF (Germany)
  26. GSRT (Greece)
  27. OTKA (Hungary)
  28. NKTH (Hungary)
  29. DAE (India)
  30. DST (India)
  31. IPM (Iran)
  32. SFI (Ireland)
  33. INFN (Italy)
  34. NRF (Korea)
  35. WCU (Korea)
  36. LAS (Lithuania)
  37. CINVESTAV (Mexico)
  38. CONACYT (Mexico)
  39. SEP (Mexico)
  40. UASLP-FAI (Mexico)
  41. MSI (New Zealand)
  42. PAEC (Pakistan)
  43. SCSR (Poland)
  44. FCT (Portugal)
  45. JINR (Armenia)
  46. JINR (Belarus)
  47. JINR (Georgia)
  48. JINR (Ukraine)
  49. JINR (Uzbekistan)
  50. MST (Russia)
  51. MAE (Russia)
  52. MSTD (Serbia)
  53. MICINN (Spain)
  54. CPAN (Spain)
  55. NSC (Taipei)
  56. TUBITAK (Turkey)
  57. TAEK (Turkey)
  58. STFC (United Kingdom)
  59. DOE (USA)
  60. NSF (USA)
  61. STFC [ST/I002200/1, ST/K003844/1, ST/K001604/1, ST/H00081X/2, ST/H000925/1, ST/F006748/1, ST/K001639/1, ST/F007434/1, ST/I505572/1, ST/I005912/1, ST/I505580/1, ST/J005665/1, ST/L00609X/1, ST/G502347/1, ST/J004901/1, ST/F007094/1, ST/I000410/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  62. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J004901/1, ST/K003844/1, ST/K001604/1 T2K, ST/K001604/1, ST/F007094/1, ST/I003622/1 GRIDPP, ST/I005912/1, GRIDPP, ST/K003844/1 GRIDPP, ST/H000925/1, ST/K001604/1 MICE/UKNF, ST/K001604/1 GRIDPP, ST/K001604/1 LHCb Upgrades, ST/K001604/1 DMUK, ST/F007434/1, ST/G502347/1, CMS, ST/F006748/1, ST/K001639/1, ST/I002200/1, ST/I505580/1, ST/I005912/1 GRIDPP, ST/I505572/1, ST/I000410/1, ST/L00609X/1, ST/K001604/1 LHCb, ST/J005665/1, ST/K001604/1 SuperNEMO, ST/K003542/1 GRID PP, ST/L00609X/1 GRIDPP, ST/K001604/1 CMS Upgrade, ST/K001256/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  63. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  64. Division Of Physics [1306951, 1205960, 1211067, 1151640] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  65. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  66. Division Of Physics [1314131, 0906479, 0969555] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results are reported from a search for non-standard-model Higgs boson decays to pairs of new light bosons, each of which decays into the mu(+)mu(-) final state. The new bosons may be produced either promptly or via a decay chain. The data set corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 5.3 fb(-1) of proton-proton collisions at root s = 7 TeV, recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2011. Such Higgs boson decays are predicted in several scenarios of new physics, including supersymmetric models with extended Higgs sectors or hidden valleys. Thus, the results of the search are relevant for establishing whether the new particle observed in Higgs boson searches at the LHC has the properties expected for a standard model Higgs boson. No excess of events is observed with respect to the yields expected from standard model processes. A model-independent upper limit of 0.86 +/- 0.06 fb on the product of the cross section times branching fraction times acceptance is obtained. The results, which are applicable to a broad spectrum of new physics scenarios, are compared with the predictions of two benchmark models as functions of a Higgs boson mass larger than 86 GeV/c(2) and of a new light boson mass within the range 0.25-3.55 GeV/c(2). (C) 2013 CERN. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据