4.7 Article

Sealing the fate of a fourth generation of fermions

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 715, 期 4-5, 页码 310-314

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.07.060

关键词

-

资金

  1. CERN TH
  2. DFG through a Heisenberg fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The search for the effects of heavy fermions in the extension of the Standard Model with a fourth generation is part of the experimental program of the Tevatron and LHC experiments. Besides being directly produced, these states affect drastically the production and decay properties of the Higgs boson. In this Letter, we first reemphasize the known fact that in the case of a light and long-lived fourth neutrino, the present collider searches do not permit to exclude a Higgs boson with a mass below the WW threshold. In a second step, we show that the recent results from the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations which observe an excess in the gamma gamma and 4l(+/-) search channels corresponding to a Higgs boson with a mass M-H approximate to 125 GeV, cannot rule out the fourth generation possibility if the H -> gamma gamma decay rate is evaluated when naively implementing the leading O(G(F)m(f')(2)) electroweak corrections. Including the exact next-to-leading order electroweak corrections leads to a strong suppression of the H -> gamma gamma rate and makes this channel unobservable with present data. Finally, we point out that the observation by the Tevatron Collaborations of a greater than or similar to 2 sigma excess in the mass range M-H = 115-135 GeV in the channel q (q) over bar -> WH -> Wb ($) over bar can definitely not be accommodated by the fourth generation fermion scenario. All in all, if the excesses observed at the LHC and the Tevatron are indeed due to a Higgs boson, they unambiguously exclude the perturbative fermionic fourth generation case. In passing, we also point out that the Tevatron excess definitely rules out the fermiophobic Higgs scenario as well as scenarios in which the Higgs couplings to gauge bosons and bottom quarks are significantly reduced. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据