4.7 Article

Measurement of spin correlation in t(t)over-bar production using dilepton final states

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 702, 期 1, 页码 16-23

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.077

关键词

Top quark; Spin; QCD

资金

  1. DOE
  2. NSF (USA)
  3. CEA
  4. CNRS/IN2P3 (France)
  5. FASI
  6. Rosatom
  7. RFBR (Russia)
  8. CNPq
  9. FAPERJ
  10. FAPESP
  11. FUNDUNESP (Brazil)
  12. DAE
  13. DST (India)
  14. Colciencias (Colombia)
  15. CONACyT (Mexico)
  16. KRF
  17. KOSEF (Korea)
  18. CONICET
  19. UBACyT (Argentina)
  20. FOM (The Netherlands)
  21. STFC
  22. Royal Society (United Kingdom)
  23. MSMT
  24. GACR (Czech Republic)
  25. CRC
  26. NSERC (Canada)
  27. BMBF
  28. DFG (Germany)
  29. SFI (Ireland)
  30. The Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  31. CAS
  32. CNSF (China)
  33. STFC [ST/J501074/1, PP/F000863/1, ST/I505756/1, ST/H00095X/2, ST/F007418/1, ST/H00095X/1, ST/H001166/1, ST/F00754X/1, PP/E000487/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  34. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00095X/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/H001166/1, ST/H00095X/2, PP/E000487/1, PP/F000863/1, PP/D004284/1, ST/F00754X/1, ST/I505756/1, ST/F007418/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  35. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measure the correlation between the spin of the top quark and the spin of the anti-top quark in t (t) over bar -> W(+)bW(-)(b) over bar -> l(+)vbl(-) (v) over bar(b) over bar final states produced in p (p) over bar collisions at a center of mass energy root s = 1.96 TeV, where l is an electron or muon. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 5.4 fb(-1) and were collected with the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron collider. The correlation is extracted from the angles of the two leptons in the t and (t) over bar rest frames, yielding a correlation strength C = 0.10(-0.45)(+0.45). in agreement with the NLO QCD prediction within two standard deviations, but also in agreement with the no correlation hypothesis. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据