4.7 Article

Environmental assessment of farm-scaled anaerobic co-digestion for bioenergy production

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 50-59

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.043

关键词

Digestate management; Environmental profile; Life cycle assessment; Maize silage; Pig slurry

资金

  1. UE project: LIVE-WASTE [LIFE 12 ENV/CY/000544]
  2. UE project: ManureEcoMine [ENV.213.6.3-2]
  3. Progetto Dote Ricerca - European Social Fund - Regione Lombardia
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [JCI-2012-11898]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to assess the environmental profile of a bioenergy system based on a co-digestion plant using maize silage and pig slurry as substrates. All the processes involved in the production of bioenergy as well as the avoided processes accrued from the biogas production system were evaluated. The results evidenced the environmental importance of the cultivation step and the environmental credits associated to the avoided processes. In addition, this plant was compared with two different plants that digest both substrates separately. The results revealed the environmental benefits of the utilisation of pig slurry due to the absence of environmental burdens associated with its production as well as credits provided when avoiding its conventional management. The results also presented the environmental drawbacks of the utilisation of maize silage due to the environmental burdens related with its production. Accordingly, the anaerobic mono-digestion of maize silage achieved the worst results. The co-digestion of both substrates was ranked in an intermediate position. Additionally, three possible digestate management options were assessed. The results showed the beneficial effect of digestate application as an organic fertiliser, principally on account of environmental credits due to avoided mineral fertilisation. However, digestate application involves important acidifying and eutrophicating emissions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据