4.6 Article

Charged particle's flux measurement from PMMA irradiated by 80 MeV/u carbon ion beam

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 18, 页码 5667-5678

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/18/5667

关键词

-

资金

  1. Museo storico della fisica e Centro di studi e ricerche Enrico Fermi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hadrontherapy is an emerging technique in cancer therapy that uses beams of charged particles. To meet the improved capability of hadrontherapy in matching the dose release with the cancer position, new dose-monitoring techniques need to be developed and introduced into clinical use. The measurement of the fluxes of the secondary particles produced by the hadron beam is of fundamental importance in the design of any dose-monitoring device and is eagerly needed to tune Monte Carlo simulations. We report the measurements carried out with charged secondary particles produced from the interaction of a 80 MeV/u fully stripped carbon ion beam at the INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, with a poly-methyl methacrylate target. Charged secondary particles, produced at 90 degrees with respect to the beam axis, have been tracked with a drift chamber, while their energy and time of flight have been measured by means of a LYSO scintillator. Secondary protons have been identified exploiting the energy and time-of-flight information, and their emission region has been reconstructed backtracking from the drift chamber to the target. Moreover, a position scan of the target indicates that the reconstructed emission region follows the movement of the expected Bragg peak position. Exploiting the reconstruction of the emission region, an accuracy on the Bragg peak determination in the submillimeter range has been obtained. The measured differential production rate for protons produced with E-kin(Prod) > 83 MeV and emitted at 90 degrees with respect to the beam line is dN(P)/(dN(C)d Omega) (E-kin(Prod) > 83 MeV, theta = 90 degrees) = (2.69 +/- 0.08(stat) +/- 0.12(sys)) x 10(-4) sr(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据