4.6 Article

Comparison of two respiration monitoring systems for 4D imaging with a Siemens CT using a new dynamic breathing phantom

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/9/N131

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD)
  2. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)
  3. Siemens (Erlangen, Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) requires breathing information from the patient, and for this, several systems are available. Testing of these systems, under realistic conditions, requires a phantom with a moving target and an expandable outer contour. An anthropomorphic phantom was developed to simulate patient breathing as well as lung tumor motion. Using the phantom, an optical camera system (GateCT) and a pressure sensor (AZ-733V) were simultaneously operated, and 4D-CTs were reconstructed with a Siemens CT using the provided local-amplitude-based sorting algorithm. The comparison of the tumor trajectories of both systems revealed discrepancies up to 9.7 mm. Breathing signal differences, such as baseline drift, temporal resolution and noise level were shown not to be the reason for this. Instead, the variability of the sampling interval and the accuracy of the sampling rate value written on the header of the GateCT-signal file were identified as the cause. Interpolation to regular sampling intervals and correction of the sampling rate to the actual value removed the observed discrepancies. Consistently, the introduction of sampling interval variability and inaccurate sampling rate values into the header of the AZ-733V file distorted the tumor trajectory for this system. These results underline the importance of testing new equipment thoroughly, especially if components of different manufacturers are combined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据