4.6 Article

Quantification of CMRO2 without hypercapnia using simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and fMRI measurements

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 3249-3269

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korean government (MEST) [2009-0081089]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0081089] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimation of the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) is important to investigate the neurovascular coupling and physiological components in blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals quantitatively. Although there are methods that can determine CMRO2 changes using functional MRI (fMRI) or near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), current approaches require a separate hypercapnia calibration process and have the potential to incur bias in many assumed model parameters. In this paper, a novel method to estimate CMRO2 without hypercapnia is described using simultaneous measurements of NIRS and fMRI. Specifically, an optimization framework is proposed that minimizes the differences between the two forms of the relative CMRO2-CBF coupling ratio from BOLD and NIRS biophysical models, from which hypercapnia calibration and model parameters are readily estimated. Based on the new methods, we found that group average CBF, CMRO2, cerebral blood volume (CBV), and BOLD changes within activation of the primary motor cortex during a finger tapping task increased by 39.5 +/- 21.4%, 18.4 +/- 8.7%, 12.9 +/- 6.7%, and 0.5 +/- 0.2%, respectively. The group average estimated flow-metabolism coupling ratio was 2.38 +/- 0.65 and the hypercapnia parameter was 7.7 +/- 1.7%. These values are within the range of values reported from other literatures. Furthermore, the activation maps from CBF and CMRO2 were well localized on the primary motor cortex, which is the main target region of the finger tapping task.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据