4.5 Article

Egg drop syndrome virus enters duck embryonic fibroblast cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis

期刊

VIRUS RESEARCH
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 69-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.07.014

关键词

EDSV; Entry pathway; Primary DEF cell; CPZ; Clathrin-mediated endocytosis

类别

资金

  1. Shaanxi Science and Technology Overall Innovation Project Plan [2015KTCL02-16]
  2. Shaanxi Science and Technology Overall Innovation Project Plan [2015KTCL02-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies of egg drop syndrome virus (EDSV) is restricted to serological surveys, disease diagnostics, and complete viral genome analysis. Consequently, the infection characteristics and entry routes of EDSV are poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to explore the entry pathway of EDSV into duck embryonic fibroblast (DEF) cells as well as the infection characteristics and proliferation of EDSV in primary DEF and primary chicken embryo liver (CEL) cells. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the virus triggered DEF cell membrane invagination as early as 10 min post-infection and that integrated endocytic vesicles formed at 20 min post-infection. The virus yield in EDSV-infected DEF cells treated with chlorpromazine (CPZ), sucrose, methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (m beta cD), or NH4Cl was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Compared with the mock treatment, CPZ and sucrose greatly inhibited the production of viral progeny in a dose-dependent manner, while M beta CD treatment did not result in a significant difference. Furthermore, NH4Cl had a strong inhibitory effect on the production of EDSV progeny. In addition, indirect immunofiuorescence demonstrated that virus particles clustered on the surface of DEF cells treated with CPZ or sucrose. These results indicate that EDSV enters DEF cells through clathrin-mediated endocytosis followed by a pH-dependent step, which is similar to the mechanism of entry of human adenovirus types 2 and 5. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据