4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Biosorptive removal of copper and cobalt from aqueous solutions: Shewanella spp. put to the test

期刊

PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH
卷 34, 期 13-16, 页码 841-849

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2009.07.009

关键词

Biosorption; Copper; Cobalt; Aqueous solutions; Shewanella spp.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biosorption of copper and cobalt by Shewanella spp. was investigated in this study. The biosorption capabilities of Shewanella spp. for copper and cobalt were monitored at different ion concentrations (0.002 M. 0.07 M and 0.2 M), biomass dosages (50, 100 and 150 (x 10(4) CFU/ml)) and pH (values 2-8) in batch mode. At optimum concentration (0.002 M/3.86 gl(-1)), biosorbent dosage (150 x 10(4) CFU/ml) and solution pH 6.5, Shewanella spp. recorded maximum copper and cobalt uptakes of 38% and 27%, respectively. The kinetic data obtained at different concentrations suggested that the biosorption rate was fast and in most cases the biosorption took place within 8 h followed by a slow attainment of equilibrium and the Langmuir sorption model fitted the data well with very high correlation efficiencies (>0.95). The results obtained in this study suggest that biosorbents, with further research, can in future be viewed as suitable sorbents in the recovery of precious metals such as copper after being discharged as effluent or as a result of mineral processing. In managing water resources, it is important that metallic species such as copper and cobalt be removed from water or reduced to acceptable levels since these metal species may cause ill-health effects to humans and livestock if the required concentration levels are exceeded. The required levels should fall within with World Health Organization (WHO) water quality guidelines and the water quality standards for various purposes (e.g. agriculture, drinking, domestic, water-reuse) as prescribed by individual countries. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据