4.5 Article

Soluble Coxsackievirus B3 3C Protease Inhibitor Prevents Cardiomyopathy in an Experimental Chronic Myocarditis Murine Model

期刊

VIRUS RESEARCH
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.11.030

关键词

Inhibitors; Antiviral agent; Myocarditis; Coxsackievirus; Chronic

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea by the Korean Government [NRF-2012R1A1A2008640]
  2. Samsung Biomedical Research Institute [SBRI GL1-B2-271-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) is a common cause of myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy. CVB3 3C protease (3CP) cleaves the viral polyprotein during replication. We tested whether a water soluble 3CP inhibitor (3CPI) had antiviral effects in a chronic myocarditis model. Methods: Chronic myocarditis was established using DBA/2 strain mice. Starting on post-infection (p.i) day 3, CVB3-infected mice (n=41) were treated with 3CPI by daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at a concentration of 50 mu M (1.7 mg/kg/day) per day for 3 consecutive days. Additional mice (n=49) were injected with PBS as a control. Results: The 5-week survival rate was significantly higher with 3CPI treatment (82.3% versus 47.9%; P<0.05). Organ virus titers at day 3 and 7 and myocardial damage were significantly lower in 3CPI-treated mice. Echocardiography at day 31 indicated strong protection of heart function by 3CPI (FS, 51.2 +/- 1.5 versus 26.1 +/- 1.5%; P<0.001). Hemodynamic measurements indicated that 3CPI treatment markedly reduced CVB3-induced LV dysfunction on day 31 (dP/dTmax, 5302 +/- 352 versus 4103 +/- 408 mmHg/s, P<0.05; dP/dTmin, -3798 +/- 212 versus -2814 +/- 206 mmHg/s, P<0.01). Conclusions: Water soluble 3CPI was delivered through i.p. injection after CVB3 infection. This agent preserved heart function and decreased organ viral titers and myocardial damage. Soluble 3CPI may be beneficial in the treatment of cardiomyopathy associated with enterovirus infection. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据