4.2 Article

Comparison of active stretching technique in males with normal and limited hamstring flexibility

期刊

PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 98-104

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.03.013

关键词

Stretching; ROM; Flexibility; Hamstring muscles; Tightness

资金

  1. Program of Human Resources Formation for Science and Technology from the Seneca Foundation under PCTRM program [06862/FPI/2007]
  2. INFO
  3. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: (1) to analyse the accumulative effects of a 12-week active stretching program on hip flexion passive range of motion (HF-PROM), and (2) to compare whether participants with different PROM baseline scores (normal and limited hamstring flexibility) respond in the same way to stretching. Design: Repeated measures design. Setting: Controlled laboratory environment. Participants: 138 males were categorized according to hamstring flexibility in the unilateral passive straight-leg raise test (PSLR) and assigned to one of two groups: normal hamstring flexibility (>= 80 degrees) or limited hamstring flexibility (<80 degrees). In each group, participants were randomly distributed into one of two treatment subgroups: (a) control or (b) active stretching. The active stretching subgroups performed 12 weeks of flexibility training, the control subgroups did not stretch. Main Outcome Measures: HF-PROM was determined through the PSLR test. Results: Both stretching subgroups significantly improved (p < 0.01) their HF-PROM from baseline. The control subgroups did not. Conclusions: 12 weeks of an active stretching program performed 3 days per week with a daily stretch dose of 180 s improved HF-PROM in both populations (normal and limited hamstring flexibility). The stretching program was equally effective in terms of absolute improvement values for males with normal and limited hamstring flexibility. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据