4.5 Review

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: An emerging and re-emerging epizootic swine virus

期刊

VIROLOGY JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12985-015-0421-2

关键词

PED; PEDV; Review; Molecular epidemiology; Diagnosis; Pathogenesis; Preventive measures

类别

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (iPET) - Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs [315021-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enteric disease of swine recognized in the early 1970s in Europe was initially described as epidemic viral diarrhea and is now termed porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED). The coronavirus referred to as PED virus (PEDV) was determined to be the etiologic agent of this disease in the late 1970s. Since then the disease has been reported in Europe and Asia, but the most severe outbreaks have occurred predominantly in Asian swine-producing countries. Most recently, PED first emerged in early 2013 in the United States that caused high morbidity and mortality associated with PED, remarkably affecting US pig production, and spread further to Canada and Mexico. Soon thereafter, large-scale PED epidemics recurred through the pork industry in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. These recent outbreaks and global re-emergence of PED require urgent attention and deeper understanding of PEDV biology and pathogenic mechanisms. This paper highlights the current knowledge of molecular epidemiology, diagnosis, and pathogenesis of PEDV, as well as prevention and control measures against PEDV infection. More information about the virus and the disease is still necessary for the development of effective vaccines and control strategies. It is hoped that this review will stimulate further basic and applied studies and encourage collaboration among producers, researchers, and swine veterinarians to provide answers that improve our understanding of PEDV and PED in an effort to eliminate this economically significant viral disease, which emerged or re-emerged worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据