4.8 Article

Topological Transitions from Multipartite Entanglement with Tensor Networks: A Procedure for Sharper and Faster Characterization

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 113, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.257202

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [PHY 1314748, PHY 1333903]
  2. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  3. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  4. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  5. ERC (TAQ)
  6. Division Of Physics
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1333903] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Physics
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1314748] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topological order in two-dimensional (2D) quantum matter can be determined by the topological contribution to the entanglement Renyi entropies. However, when close to a quantum phase transition, its calculation becomes cumbersome. Here, we show how topological phase transitions in 2D systems can be much better assessed by multipartite entanglement, as measured by the topological geometric entanglement of blocks. Specifically, we present an efficient tensor network algorithm based on projected entangled pair states to compute this quantity for a torus partitioned into cylinders and then use this method to find sharp evidence of topological phase transitions in 2D systems with a string-tension perturbation. When compared to tensor network methods for Renyi entropies, our approach produces almost perfect accuracies close to criticality and, additionally, is orders of magnitude faster. The method can be adapted to deal with any topological state of the system, including minimally entangled ground states. It also allows us to extract the critical exponent of the correlation length and shows that there is no continuous entanglement loss along renormalization group flows in topological phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据