4.8 Article

Non-Fermi-Liquid and Topological States with Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 111, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.206401

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-1151208, PHY-1066293, PHY-1125915]
  2. Hellman Family Foundation
  3. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  5. NSERC, CIFAR
  6. KITP
  7. [NSF-DMR-1206809]
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1151208] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Materials Research [1206809] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Materials Research [1151208] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We argue that a class of strongly spin-orbit-coupled materials, including some pyrochlore iridates and the inverted band gap semiconductor HgTe, may be described by a minimal model consisting of the Luttinger Hamiltonian supplemented by Coulomb interactions, a problem studied by Abrikosov and collaborators. It contains twofold degenerate conduction and valence bands touching quadratically at the zone center. Using modern renormalization group methods, we update and extend Abrikosov's classic work and show that interactions induce a quantum critical non-Fermi-liquid phase, stable provided time-reversal and cubic symmetries are maintained. We determine the universal power-law exponents describing various observables in this Luttinger-Abrikosov-Beneslavskii state, which include conductivity, specific heat, nonlinear susceptibility, and the magnetic Gruneisen number. Furthermore, we determine the phase diagram in the presence of cubic and/or time-reversal symmetry breaking perturbations, which includes a topological insulator and Weyl semimetal phases. Many of these phases possess an extraordinarily large anomalous Hall effect, with the Hall conductivity scaling sublinearly with magnetization sigma(xy) similar to M-0.51.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据