4.8 Article

Improved Determination of the Neutron Lifetime

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 111, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.222501

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIST (U.S. Department of Commerce)
  2. U S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0005925, DE-FG0203ER41258]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY-0855310, PHY-1068712, PHY-1205266]
  4. Indiana University Center for Spacetime Symmetries
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0005925] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  6. Division Of Physics
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1205266] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most precise determination of the neutron lifetime using the beam method was completed in 2005 and reported a result of tau(n) = 886.3 +/- 1.2 [stat] +/- 3.2 [syst]) s. The dominant uncertainties were attributed to the absolute determination of the fluence of the neutron beam (2.7 s). The fluence was measured with a neutron monitor that counted the neutron-induced charged particles from absorption in a thin, well-characterized Li-6 deposit. The detection efficiency of the monitor was calculated from the areal density of the deposit, the detector solid angle, and the evaluated nuclear data file, ENDF/B-VI Li-6(n,t)(4) He thermal neutron cross section. In the current work, we measure the detection efficiency of the same monitor used in the neutron lifetime measurement with a second, totally absorbing neutron detector. This direct approach does not rely on the Li-6(n, t)(4); He cross section or any other nuclear data. The detection efficiency is consistent with the value used in 2005 but is measured with a precision of 0.057%, which represents a fivefold improvement in the uncertainty. We verify the temporal stability of the neutron monitor through ancillary measurements, allowing us to apply the measured neutron monitor efficiency to the lifetime result from the 2005 experiment. The updated lifetime is tau n = d887: 7 +/- 1.2 stat +/- 1: 9[(syst]) s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据